Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jannik Sinner vs Taro Daniel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sinner vs Daniel analysis and find out who is favored!
Jannik Sinner vs Taro Daniel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sinner 1 - 0 Daniel
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sinner has won 57.53% of points on their second serve, while Daniel has won 49.94%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sinner, in recent form, has won 55.4% of their opponent's second serve points, while Daniel has won 48.06%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.16% and 27.91% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sinner has saved 75.48% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Daniel has saved 62.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sinner has won 87.18% of matches played (W/L 68/ 10), with Daniel winning 54.29% (W/L 38/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sinner has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 79% (W/L 88/ 24), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 58% (W/L 14/ 10). Daniel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 304/ 199), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 6/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Sinner has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 85.19% of matches (W/L 23/ 4), where as Daniel has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 50% of matches (W/L 15/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sinner winning 1 times and Daniel being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Sinner winning 3 and Daniel winning 1. The last match between Sinner and Daniel was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 22-01-2022, Third, Hard with Jannik Sinner getting the victory 6-4 1-6 6-3 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:41:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sinner and Daniel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sinner winning 0 times and Daniel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sinner winning 0, and Daniel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sinner has played against opponents with an average rank of 82.17 while Daniel has played against players with an average rank of 259.61.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sinner has won 77% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Daniel has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sinner has converted 45.85% of breakpoint opportunities, and Daniel has converted 40.83% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
1
Rank
1
High
22
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
84
Rank
58
High
31
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
72% (304-120)
Career Total W/L
58% (550-394)
92% (33-3)
YTD W/L
43% (13-17)
$15,419,015
Career Prize Money
$2,178,754
3
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jannik Sinner | Taro Daniel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 1 |
| Games Won | 19 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 10 | 11 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:41:0 | 2:41:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (70/95) | 56% (61/108) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (52/70) | 67% (41/61) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 32% (8/25) | 38% (18/47) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 41% (7/17) | 67% (4/6) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (49/108) | 37% (35/95) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 1-6 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Jannik Sinner
Player
Taro Daniel
74%
(
70 of
95)
1st Serve %
56%
(
61 of
108)
10
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
8
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
35 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
108)
109
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jannik Sinner | Taro Daniel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 92% (33/3) | 43% (13/17) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 84% (81/15) | 44% (31/40) |
| Games Win/Loss | 62% (552/339) | 48% (328/350) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 94% (17/1) | 47% (7/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 85% (11/2) | 38% (5/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (5/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.44 | 0.41 |
| Aces Total | 192 | 134 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 67 | 61 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:46:59 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 94.58 | 183.4 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1632/2628) | 60% (1304/2179) |
| 1st Serve W% | 79% (1288/1632) | 69% (901/1304) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 58% (573/996) | 50% (437/875) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (138/301) | 41% (69/169) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (1207/2877) | 36% (760/2110) |
| Slam W/L | 92% (12/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Masters W/L | 89% (16/2) | 33% (2/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 100% (5/0) | 56% (10/8) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 91% (20/22) | 44% (12/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 92% (12/13) | 33% (1/3) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 44% (4/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 63% (5/8) | 43% (3/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (31/29) | 80% (15/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (31/2) | 20% (15/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 80% (5/4) | 7% (15/1) |
Jannik Sinner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Jannik Sinner
66%
(
103 of
157)
1st Serve %
56%
(
76 of
135)
8
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
8
66%
(
68 of
103)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
56 of
76)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
41%
(
64 of
157)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
52 of
135)
145
Total Points Won
147
|
2-6 6-3 3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Grigor Dimitrov
60%
(
53 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
67 of
106)
8
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
45 of
67)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
23 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
110
Total Points Won
85
|
6-2 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Corentin Moutet
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
72%
(
71 of
99)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
52 of
99)
111
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Pavel Kotov
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
21 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Richard Gasquet
76%
(
58 of
76)
1st Serve %
49%
(
45 of
92)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
21 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
98
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Christopher Eubanks
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
9
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
104
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R4 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Karen Khachanov
69%
(
59 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
58 of
84)
5
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
0
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
24 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Pavel Kotov
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Taro Daniel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Taro Daniel
50%
(
65 of
129)
1st Serve %
46%
(
73 of
158)
17
Aces
10
9
Double Faults
6
89%
(
58 of
65)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
55 of
73)
56%
(
36 of
64)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
27%
(
35 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
65 of
158)
159
Total Points Won
128
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Taro Daniel
52%
(
45 of
87)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
6
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Maxime Chazal
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Taro Daniel
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
49%
(
29 of
59)
2
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
6
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
14 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
19 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Taro Daniel
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Taro Daniel
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
54%
(
30 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
45 of
79)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Taro Daniel
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
73%
(
68 of
93)
11
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
44 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
44 of
68)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
24%
(
20 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Aleksandar Vukic
76%
(
73 of
96)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
2
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
7
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
36 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
103
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 6-7(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Sinner Vs Daniel Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Sinner are available here and Daniel photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
